home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
JCSM Shareware Collection 1993 November
/
JCSM Shareware Collection - 1993-11.iso
/
cl980
/
bestart.lzh
/
BUSTER.ART
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-02-09
|
11KB
|
195 lines
BUSTER KEATON: STONE-FACED OPTIMIST
By Robert Bloch
It was 1922, in a Chicago theater. He was up on the screen,
and I was in the audience. He didn't, of course, see me-but
I saw him and (gave him the greatest tribute a five-year-old
could possibly bestow on a comedian: I laughed so hard (I
wet my pants.
The film was one of his classic two-reelers, The Boat
(1921). I didn't know it was a classic -- for that matter,
neither did Buster Keaton, for unlike Chaplin, he was never
concerned with his own status or image. He wanted only to
make us laugh.
In the years that followed I made it a point to see Keaton's
movies again and again. My trousers remained dry, but I
never stopped laughing.
His great short subjects were superseded throughout the
twenties by his great silent features. With the coming of
the talkies he gained a voice but lost his independence. A
combination of studio interference and domestic difficulties
ruined his career and his private life; comedy gave way to
tragedy.
Almost any Hollywood hack could have written the rest of the
script. The dialogue is obvious;
Buster: Please, Mr. Jennings -- you've got to help me!
Producer: Sorry, kid. We just can't use you.
Buster: Look -- all i'm asking for is a chance -- a
chance to make people laugh again.
Producer: It's too late for that now. You're through,
Buster -- washed up! Don't you understand?
You're not funny anymore!
The rest of the story is also obvious: bouts with the
bottle; an endless round of humiliations and rejections; and
then God and scriptwriter willing -- a final opportunity for
a comeback, out of the blue. For one brief moment the hero
again takes center stage, only to be struck down, dying, as
the sought-after laughter echoes in his years.
Come to think of it, Chaplin used such a script for
Limelight (1952). But Keaton would never have played it; he
wasn't one for self-pity or even audience sympathy in his
films. And he didn't play it that way in real life.
The humiliations and rejections were there, and for a time
he used drink as a weapon against them. But like the
indomitable little man he played on screen, he never
succumbed to defeat, and in the end his sheer perseverance
brought salvation. It took twenty-five years of cheap
two-reelers, sleazy foreign features, brief cameo
appearances in American films, summer stock, gag-writing for
other comedians, European circus performances, television
guest shots -- but he never gave up. Somewhere along the
line he won the girl--his wife Eleanor Norris--and discarded
the bottle. By 1960 he was again economically secure and on
the verge of fresh acclaim from a new generation.
It was then, thirty-eight years since I saw him on the
screen, that I met Buster Keaton in the flesh. I'd been
working on scripts in Hollywood for a few months when a
Writers Guild strike was called. During this period of
unemployment, friends invited me to Griffith Park to play in
a baseball game between writers and actors. There, warming
up on the field, was the actors' star pitcher: Joseph
Francis Keaton III -- Buster himself.
I did a double take. Was this pudgy, baldheaded, elderly
little man really the Great Stone Face?
The game began. The pudgy little man disappeared, and in
his place was a superbly controlled athlete, leaping into
the air for difficult catches, running bases at championship
speed, doing comic slides, backflips, and pratfalls with
dazzling timing.
He struck me out.
Later, after I was introduced by mutual friends, Mr. and
Mrs. Keaton drove me to their Woodland Hills Home.
Somewhere along the way they became Buster and Eleanor.
Over several years I came to know something of the face
behind the stoic mask. Buster loved to laugh. The man who
played The Friendless One in, Go West (1925), was, in fact,
gregarious -- fond of card playing, group sports,
entertaining. At parties he reminisced with a ukulele,
reproducing with amusing accuracy the songs and routines of
vaudeville performers he'd met through his parents' act,
"The Three Keatons."
In private moments, he enjoyed recalling summer vacations at
Muskegon, Michigan, where he led the everyday life of a
Midwestern boyhood. Only when urged would he talk about the
bad times -- candidly but without bitterness. Once I was
bold enough to ask what had sustained him through the long
years of decline. His reply was revealing: "No matter how
tough things got, I could still walk into a restaurant
anywhere in the world and get a good table. Even when
Hollywood forgot me, the audiences remembered..."
What they remembered has been analyzed in detail by film
historians. His astonishing mechanical ingenuity, the
love-hate relationship with machinery, is immortalized in
films built around a boat (The Navigator, 1924) and a train
(The General, 1926). His camera tricks are dazzling in The
Playhouse (1921), in which the entire cast of a vaudeville
show, the orchestra in the pit, and the audience consist of
Buster himself in scores of disguises, including Buster made
up as a trained chimpanzee and nine members of a blackface
minstrel troupe. His virtuosity is even more brilliant in
Sherlock, Jr. 1924); as a motion picture projectionist, he
walks into the screen and becomes a part of the film itself.
He had unerring timing and sheer perfection in his
routines, the sudden, unexpected bite of his mordant humor,
the amazing range of emotional nuances he conveyed without a
smile.
But the real secret of his genius is simple. Unlike other
great silent screen comedians, Buster Keaton was inimitable.
Charlie Chaplin's imitators were legion, and some, like
Billy West, almost defied detection. Harold Lloyd's
go-getter or coward-turned-hero roles were duplicated by
Johnny Hines and Douglas MacLean. Harry Langdon's simpleton
was a stock figure of the day, paralleled by Lloyd Hamilton
and other innocents; his white clown makeup was reminiscent
of Larry Semon's. Raymond Griffith's sophisticate echoed
Max Linder.
But no one ever imitated Buster Keaton. Lloyd was a fine
athlete; Keaton, a great one. Griffith's unflappable fop
was in no way superior to Keaton's portrayals in The
Navigator or Battling Butler (1926). Lloyd and Chaplin were
masters of the sight gag, but Keaton equaled or surpassed
them. And his use of gags was more ethical. Unlike Lloyd
or chaplin, he was not petty or malicious; yes, he would use
a gag to outwit an enemy, but he never stooped to revenge.
At times Keaton seemed to be as confused and gullible as
Langdon, but he was more resourceful. Once he sized up the
situation, he took direct and (usually) effective action.
Chaplin's mastery of mime involved exaggerated mugging to
indicate reaction; Keaton's pantomime made its point without
facial acrobatics. And while Chaplin was shameless in his
plea for audience sympathy -- witness the mawkish,
interminable death scene in Limelight -- Keaton met indignity
with dignity.
Only Keaton was versatile enough to incorporate elements of
many comedic styles into a broader and deeper
characterization which stands unequaled to this day.
The ridiculous little figure in the pancake hat, slap-shoes,
and baggy trousers may have resembled a knock-about
vaudeville performer. The resemblance ended there. Inside
that costume was Buster himself.
Chaplin was a supreme clown, Griffith a deft caricature,
Langdon a baby, Lloyd the eternal boy -- but Keaton,
combining their roles and adding the dimension of his own at
attitude toward life, was a man. The motionless face
surrounding the busy body represents a mature approach to the
problems of life -- a combination of thought and action. And
though both thoughts and actions are comic, the element of
recognition is always apparent. Buster Keaton used the
screen as a mirror. And in that mirror, the Great Stone Face
we see is always our own.
GODOT'S BEGINNINGS?
Many people wonder where Samuel Beckett got his inspiration
for his play Waiting for Godot. Beckett was a great fan of
Keaton's and wrote his short Film (1965) with Keaton in
mind, and Keaton did star. Is it possible That Beckett saw
Keaton in a minor role in a film called That Loveable Chat
(1949)? In that obscure movie, a man waits for the return
of his partner who has their fortune in his possession. He
waits and waits, but his partner never comes. The partner's
name? Godot.
(Robert Bloch has written the screenplays for many films
dealing with the macabre, including Strait-jacket, The Night
Walker, The Deadly Bees, The Torture Garden, and The House
That Dripped Blood. He is the original author of Psycho.)
-- END OF ARTICLE --